Delta Force vs. DEVGRU: Elite Tiers

Archive Text

In the shadowy world of elite special operations, few units command as much respect, intrigue, and speculation as the U.S. Army's 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (Delta Force) and the Navy's Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU), often still referred to by its former name, SEAL Team Six. Both are premier U.S. Special Mission Units (SMUs) under the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), tasked with the nation's most sensitive and dangerous missions. While often conflated or portrayed as rivals in popular culture, understanding their distinct origins, nuances, and areas of cooperation provides a clearer picture of these vital national assets.

Origins: Forged in Response to Crisis

Both units trace their modern lineage back to the rise of international terrorism in the 1970s and the perceived need for dedicated counter-terrorism (CT) capabilities.

• Delta Force: Colonel Charles Beckwith, having served with the British Special Air Service (SAS), advocated strongly for a similar American unit. Bureaucratic hurdles slowed its creation until the increasing frequency of hijackings and hostage situations forced the issue. Officially established in 1977, Delta Force was heavily influenced by the SAS model, focusing on hostage rescue (HR) and direct action (DA). The failure of Operation Eagle Claw in 1980 (the attempt to rescue American hostages in Iran, which involved Delta) further solidified the need for a dedicated joint command structure, leading to the formation of JSOC.

• DEVGRU (SEAL Team Six): The Navy recognized the need for a dedicated maritime counter-terrorism capability within its own Special Warfare community (NSW). Commander Richard Marcinko was tasked with creating this unit rapidly in 1980, following the Eagle Claw debacle. He handpicked operators from existing SEAL Teams, subjecting them to an intense, accelerated work-up. Initially named SEAL Team Six to confuse Soviet intelligence about the number of active SEAL teams, it focused primarily on maritime CT scenarios. The unit was later redesignated as the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU), reflecting a broader mandate that includes testing, evaluating, and developing new naval special warfare technology and tactics, although its operational role remains paramount.

Parent Services and Command Structure

• Delta Force: Belongs to the U.S. Army. Its operators are primarily recruited from the Army's Special Forces (Green Berets) and Ranger Regiment, although selection is technically open to any MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) across the Army and occasionally other services.

• DEVGRU: Belongs to the U.S. Navy. Its operators are drawn exclusively from the Navy's SEAL teams and SWCC (Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen) communities.

Despite their different parent services, both Delta Force and DEVGRU operate under the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), headquartered at Fort Bragg, North Carolina (soon to be Fort Liberty). JSOC ensures unity of command, synchronizes operations, and dictates standards for the nation's SMUs, which also include the Air Force's 24th Special Tactics Squadron and the Army's Regimental Reconnaissance Company (RRC) among others, often operating within joint task forces.

Primary Mission Focuses: Significant Overlap

While origins suggest distinct focuses (Delta - land/general CT, DEVGRU - maritime CT), the reality decades later is one of significant mission overlap. Both units are highly proficient in:

• Counter-Terrorism (CT): Locating, targeting, and neutralizing terrorist threats globally.

• Hostage Rescue (HR): Rescuing citizens or designated individuals held captive, domestically or abroad.

• Direct Action (DA): Short-duration strikes and small-scale offensive actions (raids, ambushes, sabotage).

• Special Reconnaissance (SR): Conducting reconnaissance and surveillance in hostile or denied areas, often in support of other operations.

• Counter-Proliferation of WMD: Missions aimed at preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction.

• High-Value Target (HVT) Capture/Kill: Operations targeting key enemy individuals.

While DEVGRU retains unique maritime expertise (like Visit, Board, Search, and Seizure - VBSS - at the highest level), and Delta might historically have had deeper roots in certain land-based infiltration techniques, both units are expected to operate effectively in any environment – urban, desert, jungle, mountain, maritime, or arctic. The specific unit assigned to a mission under JSOC often depends more on availability, current deployment posture, specific intelligence, required niche skills, and command preference rather than a strict adherence to historical specialties.

Selection and Training: The Crucible

Selection for both Delta and DEVGRU is among the most demanding military screening processes in the world, designed to identify individuals with an extraordinary blend of physical endurance, mental toughness, intelligence, maturity, and problem-solving ability under extreme stress.

• Delta Force Selection (Assessment and Selection - A&S): Candidates undergo weeks of grueling physical and psychological tests, culminating in demanding land navigation challenges over difficult terrain carrying heavy loads, with ambiguous instructions and constant evaluation. Success rates are notoriously low (often cited around 10% or less pass). Those selected proceed to the Operator Training Course (OTC), an intensive ~6-month program covering marksmanship, demolitions, espionage tradecraft, advanced driving, breaching, and DA/CT/HR tactics.

• DEVGRU Selection (Green Team): Candidates, already experienced SEALs, face a similarly brutal selection course lasting roughly 6-8 months. It involves relentless physical conditioning, extreme sleep deprivation, complex problem-solving scenarios, and mastery of advanced combat shooting, breaching, and small unit tactics specific to DEVGRU's operational profile. Attrition rates are also extremely high, comparable to Delta's A&S.

Both processes emphasize selecting mature, adaptable individuals capable of independent thought and operating effectively with minimal supervision in high-stakes environments.

Cultural Differences (Perceived)

Due to the secretive nature of both units, cultural descriptions often rely on stereotypes and anecdotal accounts. However, some perceived differences, influenced by their parent services, are often noted:

• Delta Force: Often perceived as reflecting the more structured, disciplined culture of the Army. While operators are granted significant autonomy and relaxed grooming standards compared to the conventional Army, there's often seen to be a greater emphasis on standardized procedures and a slightly more formal bearing (relatively speaking).

• DEVGRU: Frequently perceived as embodying the more individualistic and "unconventional" culture associated with the Navy SEAL community. Stereotypes sometimes paint them as slightly more relaxed in appearance and approach, perhaps reflecting their maritime roots and historical independence under Marcinko's early leadership.

Reality Check: These are broad generalizations. Both units are populated by consummate professionals focused on mission accomplishment. The demands of operating at the Tier 1 level under JSOC likely foster more similarities than differences in mindset and operational approach. Professionalism, adaptability, and lethal effectiveness are hallmarks of both organizations.

Myths vs. Realities

• Myth: Bitter, constant rivalry prevents cooperation.

  • Reality: While inter-service and unit pride exists, Delta and DEVGRU operate frequently and effectively together under JSOC. Joint Task Forces in combat zones like Iraq and Afghanistan saw extensive cooperation. Professional respect outweighs any perceived rivalry at the operational level.

• Myth: One unit is definitively "better" than the other.

  • Reality: Both are considered the pinnacle of U.S. Special Operations Forces, world-class in their capabilities. Assigning a "better" label is meaningless; they are optimized tools for specific, demanding tasks.

• Myth: They solely conduct hostage rescue or kill/capture missions.

  • Reality: Their mission set is broad, encompassing intelligence gathering, reconnaissance, and development of new tactics and equipment, alongside their more kinetic roles.

Areas of Cooperation

Cooperation is the norm, not the exception, facilitated by JSOC:

• Joint Task Forces: Deploying together under a unified command structure for specific campaigns or operations (e.g., Task Force 145 in Iraq).

• Shared Intelligence: JSOC facilitates intelligence fusion and sharing between units.

• Cross-Training/Exchange: While potentially limited, opportunities for operators to observe or participate in training with the other unit exist, fostering shared understanding of Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs).

• Standardization: JSOC promotes standardization of equipment and procedures where feasible to enhance interoperability.

Conclusion

Delta Force and DEVGRU represent the sharpest points of America's military spear. Born from different services and forged in response to emerging threats, they have evolved into highly adaptable, multi-functional Special Mission Units with largely overlapping capabilities, particularly in the critical realm of counter-terrorism. While subtle cultural differences may exist, shaped by their Army and Navy origins, both units select for extraordinary individuals and train them to unparalleled standards. Under the unifying command of JSOC, they operate not as rivals, but as complementary components of a sophisticated special operations apparatus, frequently working side-by-side to execute the nation's most critical and clandestine missions. The myths surrounding them often overshadow the reality: two exceptionally professional, capable, and cooperative organizations standing ready at the highest tier of military readiness.